MTA demands marathon runners pay tolls for closed bridges in New York

Editor
By Editor
Photo by Stability.ai | Stable Diffusion

The Metropolitan Transit Authority is requesting that the organizers of New York City’s marathon pay $750,000 a year, citing the loss of bridge toll revenue from closing the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge, the starting point for the race. MTA Bridges and Tunnels President Catherine Sheridan expressed that taxpayers should not subsidize the New York Road Runners organization and that negotiations are ongoing to reach an agreement for reimbursement.

With approximately 50,000 runners expected to participate in the marathon, the MTA’s demand of $750,000 equates to $15 per runner, while the Verrazano E-ZPass toll is $7. The New York Road Runners organization argues that the marathon already generates millions for the city’s economy and that the proposed amount from the MTA would make the race less affordable. Despite this, NYRR remains open to negotiation, emphasizing the value the MTA gains from the marathon, such as increased ridership over marathon weekend.

The 2023 marathon raised over $60 million for charity, according to NYRR, and subway ridership to the race saw the highest number of paid rides in almost four years, as reported by Gov. Kathy Hochul’s office. The MTA recently approved congestion pricing in New York City, making it the first US city to implement such a toll. Lawmakers believe this plan will help alleviate traffic congestion and provide funding for key infrastructure repairs, though there are ongoing lawsuits, including one led by New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy, attempting to block the plan.

As negotiations continue between the MTA and the New York Road Runners organization regarding the marathon’s closure of the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge and the resulting loss of toll revenue, the importance of reaching a resolution that reflects the value of the marathon to both parties is evident. The marathon not only brings significant economic benefits to the city but also attracts a large number of participants and spectators, contributing to increased subway ridership and showcasing New York City on a global scale. Collaboration and compromise will be essential in finding a fair and mutually beneficial solution to this issue.

In conclusion, the ongoing dispute between the MTA and NYRR over the proposed payment for the New York City Marathon highlights the complexities of balancing financial considerations with the economic and cultural value of a major event. The marathon is a significant part of New York City’s identity and brings numerous benefits to the city and its residents. As negotiations continue, finding a solution that is fair to all parties involved while recognizing the contributions and impact of the marathon on the city should be the primary goal. Ultimately, a resolution that ensures the sustainability and success of the marathon while addressing the concerns of the MTA is crucial for the continued partnership and success of this iconic event.

Share This Article