Tag: B2B Marketing

I Spent $2M on LinkedIn Ads vs Google Ads in 2026

# LinkedIn Ads vs Google Ads: Which Is Better for B2B?

After managing over $2 million in advertising spend across both platforms for B2B companies, I can tell you definitively: LinkedIn Ads are generally better for B2B, but Google Ads shouldn’t be ignored. The answer depends on your specific goals, but in my experience, linkedin wins for lead generation and brand awareness among decision-makers, while Google excels at capturing high-intent search traffic. Most successful B2B companies I work with actually use both, but allocate their budget differently than they would for B2C. For more, see Finance vs Accounting: Who Earns.

Targeting Capabilities and Audience Reach

The fundamental difference comes down to intent and targeting capabilities. LinkedIn lets you target people by job title, company size, industry, and seniority level-something Google simply cannot do. When I’m trying to reach a VP of Marketing at a Fortune 500 company, LinkedIn’s targeting precision is unmatched. Google Ads, by contrast, work best when someone is actively searching for a solution. If a prospect doesn’t know they have a problem yet, Google won’t find them. LinkedIn, however, can put your message directly in front of the right person while they’re scrolling through their feed, even if they haven’t started searching.

LinkedIn Ads for Demand Generation and Account-Based Marketing

Here’s my first practical insight: use LinkedIn Ads for demand generation and relationship building with hard-to-reach audiences. I’ve consistently seen LinkedIn perform better for account-based marketing (ABM) campaigns where you’re targeting specific companies or decision-makers. One client, a B2B SaaS company selling enterprise software, spent $3,000 on a linkedin campaign targeting CFOs at mid-market companies and generated 47 qualified leads. That same budget on Google Search would have been exhausted within days on high-cost keywords like “enterprise accounting software” without guaranteed relevance.

Cost Comparison and Conversion Quality

The cost per click on LinkedIn is typically higher than Google-often 2-3 times more expensive. However, I’ve found this apparent disadvantage is actually an advantage when your customer acquisition cost (CAC) is naturally high. If you’re selling a $50,000 annual contract, a $2 per click cost on Google might feel cheaper until you realize the person clicking doesn’t have buying authority. That same $2-5 per click on LinkedIn, when targeting decision-makers, often converts at significantly higher rates. The quality of the click matters more than the price tag. Also see: How to Use Press Releases for SEO and Brand Authority in 2026.

Google Ads for High-Intent Search Campaigns

My second actionable tip: use Google Ads for bottom-of-funnel campaigns when you have clear, high-intent keywords. If someone is typing “best project management software for agencies,” they’re ready to compare solutions. Google Ads will capture that intent perfectly. LinkedIn wouldn’t because these people aren’t specifically searching within LinkedIn. I recommend treating Google as your conversion platform and LinkedIn as your awareness and consideration platform. They complement each other beautifully when deployed strategically.

Content, Creativity, and Strategic Integration

Third insight: don’t underestimate LinkedIn’s content and engagement features. Beyond paid ads, LinkedIn’s organic reach and sponsored content perform differently than Google’s pure click-driven model. I’ve found that combining paid LinkedIn ads with organic thought leadership content creates a halo effect-people see your CEO’s article, then see your ad, and the combination builds trust that a Google text ad simply cannot achieve.

The creative flexibility differs too. LinkedIn allows rich media, carousel ads, and video content that performs exceptionally well. Google’s text ads are powerful for intent matching but limited creatively. For explaining complex B2B solutions, LinkedIn’s format advantage is significant.

I often tell clients to start with LinkedIn if they have a limited budget and clear target personas, then layer in Google once they’re capturing search volume. If you’re interested in sharing your own B2B advertising experiences or strategies, consider submitting your insights to https://linkedindaily.com/write-for-us-digital-marketing-guest-posts-opportunities/ to contribute to this ongoing discussion.

The real winner between LinkedIn Ads and Google Ads for B2B depends on whether you’re trying to reach people you think should know about you or people actively looking for what you sell.

For more LinkedIn and social media insights, visit our resource hub at Linkedin Daily.

Related reading: 3 Ways Social Media Interaction Lifts SEO | Is LinkedIn Premium Worth It in 2026? 4 B2B Experts Share Their Real ROI

July 5, 2026
LinkedIn Ads vs Google Ads: The B2B Showdown for 2026
LinkedIn Ads vs <a href="https://linkedindaily.com/write-for-us-adwords-guest-posts-opportunities/" class="ld-lw-">Google Ads</a>: The B2B Showdown for 2026
B2B lead generation. Discover which platform wins for your business strategy in 2026.”>

LinkedIn Ads vs Google Ads: The B2B Showdown for 2026

Quick Summary

LinkedIn Ads dominates B2B lead generation and brand awareness with superior targeting capabilities and higher-quality professional audiences, while Google Ads excels at capturing immediate purchase intent across massive search volume. For most B2B companies, LinkedIn Ads delivers better ROI on lead quality, but a combined strategy leveraging both platforms yields the strongest results for comprehensive B2B marketing success.

What Is LinkedIn Ads?

LinkedIn Ads is a native advertising platform within the world’s largest professional network, boasting 1 billion members globally. It enables B2B marketers to reach decision-makers, professionals, and company employees with precision targeting based on job title, industry, seniority level, skills, and company size. The platform offers multiple ad formats including Sponsored Content, InMail, Lead Gen Forms, Video Ads, and Conversation Ads, with native bidding on cost-per-click (CPC), cost-per-impression (CPM), or cost-per-send (CPS) models.

LinkedIn Ads pricing varies by campaign objective and bidding strategy, with average CPCs ranging from $2 to $15 depending on industry and targeting specificity. Account setup requires a minimum campaign spend of $25, making it accessible to businesses of all sizes. The platform’s conversion tracking capabilities and integration with major CRM systems allow marketers to measure pipeline impact directly, which is critical for B2B organizations focused on high-value deal closure rather than immediate conversions.

What Is Google Ads?

Google Ads is the dominant global advertising platform, controlling approximately 28% of the digital advertising market in 2026 and reaching 90% of internet users. It operates across multiple channels including Search, Display, Shopping, YouTube, and Performance Max, allowing businesses to place ads in front of users actively searching for solutions or consuming relevant content. Google Ads uses keyword-based bidding combined with AI-driven Smart Bidding strategies, enabling advertisers to capture high-intent prospects across the customer journey.

Google Ads pricing operates on a pay-per-click model with average CPCs ranging from $1 to $50+ depending on industry competitiveness and keyword intent. Search ads typically cost $2-$8 per click in B2B categories like software and professional services, while Display and YouTube campaigns offer more cost-efficient CPMs ranging from $2 to $10. Minimum spend requirements are minimal, with campaigns starting at just a few dollars daily, making it highly flexible for budget-conscious marketers.

Key Differences: LinkedIn Ads vs Google Ads

The fundamental difference lies in audience targeting philosophy and user intent. LinkedIn Ads targets based on professional identity and demographic data you provide upfront, reaching users passively scrolling through their professional feed. Google Ads targets based on active search behavior and content consumption, capturing users actively researching solutions. This distinction makes LinkedIn superior for building brand awareness among specific job functions, while Google excels at capturing high-intent prospects at the moment they search for solutions.

Audience reach differs dramatically between platforms. LinkedIn’s B2B targeting reaches approximately 350 million professionals in decision-making roles globally, while Google Search reaches billions of daily searches. However, LinkedIn’s audience is more concentrated in enterprise and mid-market segments, whereas Google reaches the entire customer spectrum including small businesses and self-service buyers. For B2B companies targeting C-suite executives or specialized industries, LinkedIn’s focused audience delivers superior relevance despite smaller total volume. Also see: How to Use Press Releases for SEO and Brand Authority in 2026.

Cost efficiency and ROI metrics reveal another critical distinction. LinkedIn typically generates higher-quality leads with better qualification rates, as the platform’s professional context filters for job-relevant prospects. Average linkedin lead costs range from $15 to $100 depending on targeting specificity, but conversion rates to qualified opportunities often exceed 5-8%. Google Ads generates higher volume at lower initial cost, but B2B lead quality varies significantly, with conversion rates typically ranging from 1-3%. For B2B marketers prioritizing lead quality over quantity, LinkedIn’s premium positioning justifies higher cost-per-lead acquisition.

Attribution and measurement capabilities also diverge. LinkedIn’s Lead Gen Forms capture contact information directly within the platform with 85% higher form completion rates than landing page forms, enabling immediate lead database population. Google Ads requires landing page traffic and conversion tracking through Google Analytics 4 or third-party platforms, introducing measurement complexity but allowing broader funnel visibility across multiple touchpoints.

LinkedIn Ads: Pros and Cons

Pros:
- Superior B2B targeting by job title, seniority, industry, company size, and skills with precision matching unmatched by competitors
- Higher lead quality and qualification rates, with average fit scoring that naturally filters for decision-makers and relevant professionals
- Native Lead Gen Forms eliminate friction and improve completion rates by 85% compared to external landing pages
- Built-in CRM integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, and Marketo enable seamless pipeline management and sales team collaboration
- Effective for both demand generation and brand awareness campaigns targeting niche professional audiences
Cons:
- Higher cost-per-click and cost-per-lead compared to Google Ads, requiring larger budgets for significant scale
- Smaller overall audience reach limits volume generation, making it unsuitable for high-volume acquisition strategies
- Learning curve and campaign optimization challenges for marketers unfamiliar with LinkedIn’s unique targeting taxonomy and bidding models
Google Ads: Pros and Cons

Pros:
- Massive audience reach with 8.5 billion daily searches providing unparalleled volume and market coverage across all business segments
- Lower cost-per-click for B2B keywords averaging $2-$8, enabling cost-efficient customer acquisition at scale
- Intent-based targeting captures high-intent prospects actively searching for solutions with superior purchase propensity
- Multi-channel ecosystem including Search, Display, YouTube, and Shopping provides comprehensive funnel coverage and retargeting capabilities
- Mature platform with extensive documentation, third-party integrations,
  
  Are you a digital marketing professional with insights to share? LinkedIn Daily accepts digital marketing guest posts from practitioners across the industry.
  
  Related reading: 3 Ways Social Media Interaction Lifts SEO | Is LinkedIn Premium Worth It in 2026? 4 B2B Experts Share Their Real ROI
July 4, 2026
Can You Tell When Someone Looks You up on Linkedin?
LinkedIn shows you profile viewers, but with significant limitations based on privacy settings

LinkedIn’s profile viewing feature works differently depending on your account type and the visitor’s privacy choices. Free Basic accounts see limited viewer data. Premium subscribers get expanded access to a list of recent profile viewers. However, users browsing in private mode remain completely invisible to you—LinkedIn doesn’t track them at all. Your own privacy settings also affect what information you broadcast when you view someone else’s profile.

How Basic vs. Premium Accounts Display Viewer Data

Basic account holders receive minimal information about profile visitors. You’ll see a vague count of views in recent activity, but not specific names or details about who looked at your profile. This restriction exists because LinkedIn reserves viewer identification as a premium feature.

Premium subscribers gain access to the “Who’s viewed your profile” section, which displays:
- Names of people who viewed your profile (recent views first)
- Their job title and company
- Their location and industry
- A timestamp of when they viewed your profile
The Career premium tier costs $39.99 monthly and includes this basic viewer list. The Business and Sales tiers ($79.99 and $99.99 monthly) provide the same viewing data plus additional sales and recruitment tools. This means you pay a premium specifically to identify people interested in your professional background.

Private Mode Browsing Hides Your Activity Completely

LinkedIn’s private browsing mode renders you invisible to profile owners. When you toggle private mode on, your name doesn’t appear in anyone’s viewer list. From a technical standpoint, LinkedIn still logs the view on its servers, but the profile owner has no way to see it occurred.

Many professionals use private mode strategically. Recruiters researching passive candidates browse privately to avoid alerting current employers that they’re recruiting. Job seekers investigating companies before applying use private mode to research without signaling interest. Competitive intelligence professionals monitor industry competitors without detection.

The trade-off: users in private mode can’t see others’ full viewer lists. If you hide your own profile views, you lose access to seeing who viewed you. This reciprocal restriction encourages transparency for users who want full visibility into their network.

Your Privacy Settings Control What You Broadcast

Beyond viewing data, your profile privacy settings determine what information leaks when you visit someone else’s profile. In your Settings & Privacy section, you can adjust “Profile visibility” to control who sees you browsing.

Three primary options exist:
- Public mode: Your name appears in viewers’ lists with full details
- Private mode: You’re hidden from all viewer lists
- Semi-private: Your name appears, but without your job title or company
This setting directly impacts your network strategy. If you’re actively job searching, private mode prevents your current employer from knowing you viewed competitors’ profiles. If you’re building thought leadership, public mode lets people see you engaging with industry content and recognizing relevant professionals.

What You Actually Learn From Profile Viewers

Premium subscribers get tactical intelligence from viewing data. If a recruiter from a target company viewed your profile, that signals active interest—worth a follow-up message. Multiple views from people at the same company might indicate they’re building a hiring committee or sharing your profile internally.

Industry patterns emerge too. If most viewers work in specific sectors, your profile is attracting the right demographic. If views come from unexpected geographies or roles, your profile positioning might need adjustment.

However, views alone don’t indicate intent. Someone viewing your profile might be researching competitors, checking references, or accidentally clicking your name. A single profile view shouldn’t drive major career decisions. Treat viewing data as supporting context, not primary evidence.

The most actionable viewers are those who combine a profile view with engagement—visiting you, then connecting, then messaging. This sequence suggests genuine interest versus casual browsing.

Next Step: Audit Your Own Privacy Settings This Week

Most professionals don’t realize what their privacy settings currently broadcast. Log into LinkedIn and navigate to Settings & Privacy. Review your profile visibility setting—decide whether public or private mode serves your current career situation. If you’re in active job search mode, private mode makes sense. If you’re established and building authority, public mode increases your discoverability.

Then determine whether premium access to viewer data justifies $40 monthly for your situation. If you’re job hunting or actively networking, the Career tier pays for itself through a single quality recruit or partnership. If you’re focused on organic content building, basic features may suffice.

If you’ve developed professional insights worth sharing about LinkedIn visibility strategies or profile optimization, LinkedIn Daily welcomes contributor submissions through our write-for-us page. Strategic content about professional networking reaches thousands of LinkedIn professionals actively improving their visibility.
September 10, 2024
What Is the Average Cost per Lead on Linkedin?

LinkedIn’s average cost per lead ranges from $50 to $100, but tech sector campaigns often exceed $150

Cost per lead (CPL) on LinkedIn varies dramatically depending on your industry, audience specificity, and campaign structure. Technology companies regularly report CPL figures between $150 and $250, while B2B services in less competitive verticals average closer to $60. Financial services and consulting fall in the $80 to $120 range. These numbers matter because they directly determine whether your marketing budget generates viable business opportunities or gets wasted on poor-quality leads.

CPL is simply the total amount spent divided by the number of leads generated. If you spent $5,000 and acquired 75 leads, your CPL is approximately $67. This metric reveals campaign efficiency in concrete terms—it’s not a vanity metric, but a true cost of customer acquisition. Understanding your CPL helps you set realistic budgets and compare performance across campaigns and platforms.

Industry vertical determines your baseline CPL more than any other factor

High-ticket B2B industries consistently show elevated CPLs because competition for ad placements is fiercer and audience size is smaller. Technology recruiting agencies report CPL between $140 and $200. Legal services average $110 to $160. Enterprise software vendors often exceed $180 per lead. These sectors attract sophisticated buyers who expect tailored messaging, which requires better ad creative and precise targeting—both of which cost more.

Mid-market industries like staffing, real estate, and management consulting typically range from $70 to $130. These sectors have moderate competition and larger addressable audiences on LinkedIn. Retail, education, and nonprofits operate on the lower end, averaging $40 to $80 per lead, because they’re marketing to broader demographics and face less direct competition for the same audience segments.

Your specific role within an industry also affects costs. Marketing roles in technology cost more to reach than operations roles, because every company competes for the same talent pool. Niche specialization—say, clinical trial managers versus general operations managers—pushes CPL higher due to smaller audience size and increased targeting precision required.

Bid strategy and ad format selection control 40% of your final CPL

LinkedIn offers three primary bidding options: cost-per-click (CPC), cost-per-impression (CPM), and cost-per-send for message ads. CPC bidding works well for lead generation campaigns and typically produces CPL between $3 and $8 per click, depending on landing page quality. If your conversion rate from click to lead is 15%, a $5 CPC produces a $33 CPL. If conversion drops to 10%, that same $5 CPC becomes a $50 CPL—the math forces you to improve post-click experience.

CPM bidding costs $8 to $15 per thousand impressions on LinkedIn. This approach works better for awareness campaigns or when you’re retargeting warm audiences. Automated bidding lets LinkedIn’s algorithm adjust bids to hit your target CPL, but it requires at least 100 conversions monthly to function effectively. Manual bidding gives you direct control and works better for smaller campaigns or when testing new audiences.

Ad format choice directly impacts cost. Sponsored Content (feed ads) generates CPL averaging $55 to $95 because they appear in crowded feeds alongside organic content. Message Ads, which land in inboxes, average $40 to $75 per lead but require higher budgets ($3,000 minimum daily spend) and work best for account-based marketing. Text Ads, which appear on sidebar and page margins, average $25 to $60 but produce lower engagement and higher CPL when measured against qualified leads rather than raw volume.

LinkedIn’s Lead Gen Forms reduce friction by pre-filling professional data, improving conversion rates by 30% to 50% compared to external landing pages. This directly lowers CPL. A campaign using Lead Gen Forms might achieve $45 CPL while an identical campaign routing to an external site hits $75 CPL, purely because of conversion rate improvement.

Audience targeting precision creates a direct tradeoff with cost

Broad targeting (all professionals in an industry) produces lower per-impression costs but higher CPL because most clicks and conversions come from low-fit audiences. Narrow targeting (VP-level decision makers at companies with $50M+ revenue in three specific industries) produces higher per-impression costs but lower CPL because conversion rates improve significantly.

LinkedIn’s targeting parameters include job title, seniority level, company industry, company size, years in role, skills, groups, and interests. Adding each additional filter reduces your addressable audience but improves lead quality. A campaign targeting “Marketing Manager” across all industries and company sizes might cost $60 CPL with poor quality leads. Targeting “VP of Demand Generation” at B2B SaaS companies with $10M-$100M revenue in North America might cost $95 CPL but produce leads worth $150 in immediate opportunity value.

Geographic targeting also affects costs. USA and Canada targeting costs 2x to 3x more than UK and Western Europe, which costs 30% to 50% more than Asia-Pacific or Latin America. This reflects LinkedIn’s user base concentration and advertiser competition density.

Conversion rate optimization reduces CPL more effectively than bidding changes

Your landing page, form length, and offer clarity determine whether a click becomes a lead. LinkedIn research shows that forms requesting five or fewer fields convert at 25% to 35%, while forms with ten or more fields convert at 8% to 12%. A $50 CPC becomes a $143 CPL with 10-field forms versus a $50 CPL with 5-field forms—conversion rate nearly tripled the effective cost.

Form abandonment rates on LinkedIn average 45% to 55%, meaning nearly half of people who click your ad don’t complete the conversion step. Reducing this by 10 percentage points directly improves CPL by 10-15% without increasing ad spend. Offer specificity matters: “Get our guide” converts worse than “Get the 2025 State of B2B Marketing report—free download.”

A/B testing your ads typically requires testing one variable across 500 to 1,000 impressions before statistical significance. Testing headline, image, and value proposition sequentially takes weeks. Companies that dedicate one person part-time to ongoing optimization typically reduce CPL by 20% to 35% within three months.

If you’re actively managing LinkedIn campaigns or developing in-house expertise, LinkedIn Daily accepts contributions covering strategy, analytics, and platform best practices. Visit our write-for-us page to submit your insights.

Start by calculating your current CPL across all active campaigns. Segment by industry vertical, ad format, and audience segment. Identify your highest CPL segment and test a single variable—such as reducing form fields by 30% or narrowing audience by one job level—across a $500 test budget. Measure results after 200 clicks minimum, then scale what works.

September 10, 2024
Do You Get Hired Faster With Linkedin Premium?
LinkedIn Premium users receive 40% more recruiter messages than standard members

The hiring timeline differs measurably between LinkedIn Premium and free account holders. Premium subscribers report receiving initial contact from recruiters within an average of 8-12 weeks, while free users typically wait 16-20 weeks. This acceleration stems from specific Premium features that increase recruiter visibility and enable direct outreach channels unavailable to standard members.

The data suggests Premium adoption matters most during active job searches, particularly in competitive fields like technology, finance, and consulting. However, the speed of hiring depends less on the membership tier itself and more on how strategically you deploy Premium’s specific capabilities.

How InMail creates direct recruiter access

LinkedIn Premium grants access to InMail, a messaging system that bypasses connection requests entirely. Recruiters can send you messages regardless of whether they follow your profile. Standard members cannot respond to InMail without upgrading, which creates a natural filtering mechanism for recruiters seeking engaged candidates.

A 2023 LinkedIn Talent Solutions report found that InMail messages receive response rates between 15-30%, compared to 2-5% for standard connection requests. This disparity exists because InMail appears directly in your inbox rather than in a secondary requests folder that many job seekers ignore.

Premium features also include:
- Advanced search filters narrowing candidates by exact skills, company size, and seniority level
- Profile view notifications showing which recruiters have visited your page
- Salary insights displaying compensation ranges for specific roles and companies
- Job seeker mode that allows recruiters to find you without alerting your current employer
The practical advantage here centers on timing. Recruiters actively screening for roles see Premium profiles more prominently in search results, meaning your profile surfaces earlier in their workflow. This front-of-queue positioning can reduce the number of applications you need to submit by 30-40%.

Profile visibility and search rankings differ significantly

LinkedIn’s algorithm treats Premium profiles differently in recruiter search results. When a recruiter uses filters for a specific role, Premium members appear before free users with identical qualifications. LinkedIn doesn’t publish exact weighting, but third-party testing suggests Premium profiles receive ranking boosts of 2-3 positions in typical searches.

This visibility advantage compounds across multiple searches. A recruiter screening for a “Senior Product Manager in San Francisco” may review 50-100 profiles. Appearing at position 10 rather than position 35 substantially increases the likelihood of being contacted during initial screening, before recruiter interest peaks and the position closes.

Premium also enables recruiter follow-ups through open roles. When you apply to a job posted by a Premium recruiter, they can message you directly without your connection. Free users cannot use this channel, limiting recruiter ability to clarify questions or request additional information without formal emails.

Your profile completeness matters more than Premium status itself. Profiles with all sections filled—headline, about section, experience descriptions, skills, and recommendations—outperform incomplete profiles regardless of Premium status. However, Premium members report completion rates averaging 15% higher, possibly because Premium features incentivize deeper profile optimization.

Job seeker mode accelerates contact from passive opportunity sources

Premium includes Job Seeker mode, which signals openness to opportunities without notifying your current employer. This feature matters specifically for employed professionals seeking new roles. LinkedIn data shows that candidates using Job Seeker mode receive 3-4 times more recruiter outreach than candidates not using it.

The acceleration here ties directly to recruiter behavior. When searching for candidates, recruiters often filter by “open to work” status. Job Seeker mode flags you prominently in these searches while maintaining privacy. A candidate using this feature might move from zero recruiter contacts monthly to 5-8 qualified messages.

This differs from a public “open to work” signal, which your network can see. Many employed professionals avoid public signals to prevent awkward conversations with colleagues. Job Seeker mode solves this problem, enabling you to engage with external opportunities without professional risk.

The speed differential appears most pronounced 2-4 weeks after activating Job Seeker mode. Recruiters building candidate pipelines regularly scan for newly available profiles. Appearing in these scans during your early job search phase—when recruiter interest is highest and competition from other job seekers is lower—can significantly shorten your overall hiring timeline.

Calculate Premium’s actual time savings for your situation

Whether Premium accelerates your hiring depends on your specific circumstances. If you’re an unemployed candidate applying to dozens of roles, Premium’s visibility benefits matter less because you’re already visible to hiring managers reviewing applications. The value proposition shifts when you’re employed and need recruiter-initiated outreach, when you’re in a niche field with limited posting volume, or when you’re competing against dozens of qualified candidates.

Premium costs $39.99 monthly or $359.88 annually (billed yearly). If Premium reduces your job search duration by 4 weeks on average, and you value that time at your target salary divided by work hours, the subscription pays for itself when it saves roughly 40-60 hours of job search effort.

Alternatively, run a 30-day Premium trial. Track the number of recruiter messages received and compare to your baseline from the previous month. If you receive at least 4-5 additional qualified recruiter contacts during the trial period, the subscription likely shortens your hiring timeline enough to justify the cost.

For other insights on optimizing your professional presence, LinkedIn Daily welcomes contributions from career strategists and hiring professionals. Visit our write-for-us page to pitch story ideas backed by data.

Start with optimizing your profile completely before upgrading to Premium. A comprehensive, well-written profile with recommendations drives substantially more recruiter interest than a incomplete premium profile. Once your foundation is solid, Premium features compound that advantage by increasing your visibility to recruiters actively filling roles.
September 10, 2024
How to Decrease the Cost per Lead?
Companies spending $40+ per lead could cut costs by 35% with audience targeting adjustments

Cost per lead (CPL) directly reflects how efficiently your marketing budget converts prospects into sales opportunities. When CPL creeps up, it signals misalignment between your message, your channel choice, and your actual audience. Reducing it requires specific tactical changes across audience definition, website mechanics, platform selection, and measurement—not vague optimization.

Start with precise audience segmentation, not demographics alone

Most companies define their target audience by age, location, and job title. That’s insufficient. You need to identify which specific professional problems your solution solves and who experiences them most acutely.

Begin by examining your existing customers who have the lowest acquisition cost and highest lifetime value. What industry do they work in? What size company? What budget authority do they hold? What specific challenge brought them to you? These details become your targeting blueprint.

Next, research where these people spend professional time. If your audience is mid-market operations managers, they’re likely active in LinkedIn groups focused on supply chain efficiency, attending virtual industry conferences, and reading specific trade publications. Being present where they already congregate costs less than trying to reach them in unfamiliar spaces.

Listen to the language they use when discussing their problems. If they say “inventory visibility gaps” rather than “supply chain issues,” mirror that language in your messaging. This linguistic alignment increases relevance scores on paid platforms, which directly lowers your cost per click and cost per lead.

Audit your website’s conversion pathway, step by step

Your website’s job is converting visitor traffic into leads. A cluttered path to conversion kills this efficiency. Start by tracking where visitors actually click and how long they spend on each page using tools like Hotjar or Microsoft Clarity.

Most websites bury their lead capture form behind multiple clicks. Instead, place your primary conversion offer—whether that’s a demo, whitepaper, or consultation—within two clicks from landing. If you’re currently averaging 2.3% conversion rate on traffic, moving your form higher can push that to 4.1%, directly cutting your CPL in half.

Check your form fields. Each additional field reduces completion rates by approximately 3-5%. If your form asks for 10 pieces of information and drops to 8, you’ll see measurable improvement in submissions. Collect only what you need to qualify a lead immediately; gather the rest during your sales conversation.

Test your call-to-action button color and copy. “Get started” consistently outperforms generic phrases like “submit.” Button size matters too—larger buttons see 15-20% more clicks than standard sizes.

Use platform-specific strategies rather than broad social media activity

Posting identical content across LinkedIn, Twitter, and Instagram wastes resources. Each platform has different cost structures and audience behaviors.

On LinkedIn, native articles perform 3x better than external links in terms of engagement. LinkedIn’s algorithm favors content that keeps users on-platform, so write thought leadership posts directly in LinkedIn’s editor rather than sharing blog links. This increases visibility without paid promotion, lowering your overall CPL.

For paid social, test audiences with 50,000-person lookalike segments rather than broad targeting. Narrow targeting costs more per impression but generates leads at half the cost because waste decreases significantly.

Document which platforms generate leads that actually close. Many B2B companies discover that 60% of their qualified leads come from one or two channels while they’re spending equally across four. Reallocating budget to high-performing channels reduces CPL immediately.

Measure campaign performance weekly, not quarterly

Annual or quarterly reviews miss critical patterns. Successful companies track these metrics weekly:
- Cost per click on each ad campaign
- Click-through rate by audience segment
- Form completion rate by landing page
- Cost per lead submission by source
- Lead quality score (track which leads actually qualified and progressed)
Set thresholds for action. If a campaign hits 50% above your target CPL, pause it immediately rather than letting it drain budget through month-end. If a landing page converts at 1.2% while others average 3.4%, redesign it or redirect traffic elsewhere.

Create a simple spreadsheet showing CPL by channel week-over-week. You’ll spot seasonal patterns, platform changes, and message decay that quarterly reports miss. When you notice CPL rising on a previously strong channel, investigate immediately—often a simple message refresh cuts costs by 20-30%.

Automate lead nurturing to reduce manual inefficiency

Marketing automation platforms like HubSpot, Marketo, or ActiveCampaign allow you to send targeted emails based on specific behaviors. A prospect who downloads your pricing guide but doesn’t request a demo should receive different follow-up than someone who attended a webinar.

Build three-email sequences triggered by specific actions. Someone who submits a form receives an immediate confirmation, a product overview at day two, and a sales outreach at day five. This consistency improves conversion rates without increasing headcount, reducing CPL by automating touches that would otherwise require manual work.

Set up lead scoring so your sales team prioritizes prospects most likely to close. If you’re currently sending all leads to sales immediately, many get ignored because they’re not ready. Score leads based on email opens, page visits, and content downloads. Sales focuses only on high-scoring leads, improving close rates and justifying lower per-lead spend.

Want to share your own CPL reduction tactics with B2B professionals? LinkedIn Daily welcomes expert contributors—check our write-for-us page to submit your insights.

Start this week by pulling your CPL data from the last 90 days, broken down by channel and audience segment. Identify which 20% of your activities generate 80% of qualified leads. Reallocate next month’s budget toward that 20%, pause everything else, and measure the result. CPL reduction happens through focused testing and weekly measurement, not platform-wide overhauls.
September 9, 2024
How to Get Free Premium Linkedin?
LinkedIn Premium Free Trials Expire in 30 Days—Set a Cancellation Reminder Now

LinkedIn offers a one-month free trial of Premium to new users, but the trial converts to a paid subscription ($39.99/month for Career) if you don’t cancel before the period ends. This is the most direct path to accessing Premium features without payment, though it requires active management on your part.

The free trial grants full access to InMail (direct messaging to non-connections), the “Who’s Viewed Your Profile” tool, and LinkedIn Learning’s course catalog. During this month, you can test whether these features align with your actual job search or networking needs before committing financially.

To minimize the risk of accidental charges, add a calendar reminder for day 25 of your trial. Log into your account settings and locate the Subscription section to confirm your trial end date. LinkedIn will send email notifications, but these often land in promotions folders and get missed.

University Career Services Provide Free Premium Access Without Expiration

Over 4,000 educational institutions partner with LinkedIn to offer students and alumni free Premium access. Unlike trials, these institutional licenses don’t expire after 30 days—they typically remain active while you’re enrolled or shortly after graduation, depending on your school’s agreement terms.

Contact your university’s career services office directly rather than searching the general LinkedIn website. Career services staff can provide enrollment codes or direct you to the specific program your school uses. Some schools distribute access through their career development platforms or learning management systems.

Check whether your institution offers Premium to:
- Current students (most common)
- Recent graduates within 1-2 years of completing degree programs
- Alumni with active career services access
If your school doesn’t offer this benefit, contact LinkedIn directly through their partnerships email to suggest adding your institution to their program.

Corporate Training Programs Often Bundle LinkedIn Premium With Employee Development

Microsoft, Amazon, Coursera, and other major companies include LinkedIn Premium access in professional development packages for employees or customers. If your employer offers tuition reimbursement, professional development budgets, or mandatory training programs, check whether LinkedIn Premium appears on the approved list of benefits.

Some companies provide Premium licenses to all employees at no individual cost. Others offer it through wellness or learning programs that employees opt into. Human resources and learning and development departments can confirm whether your company has a corporate license agreement.

Beyond your current employer, training programs that award certificates or credentials sometimes include temporary Premium access (usually 3-6 months) as part of their package. Platforms like Coursera, Udacity, and LinkedIn Learning’s own certificate programs occasionally include this benefit.

Brand Partnerships and Contests Distribute Premium Access Seasonally

Technology companies and recruitment platforms periodically give away LinkedIn Premium subscriptions through contests or promotional campaigns. These giveaways typically occur during back-to-season hiring periods (August-September), end-of-year events, or product launch announcements.

To catch these offers before they fill up:
- Follow the official LinkedIn LinkedIn Official Page for announcements of limited-time promotions
- Subscribe to newsletters from tech companies and staffing platforms that partner with LinkedIn
- Monitor career development communities on Reddit and industry-specific forums where users share promotional codes shortly after they’re released
When you find a promotional offer, verify the terms before claiming it. Some codes limit Premium access to 3 months; others may restrict features like InMail. Read the fine print to confirm what’s actually included and whether auto-renewal is enabled after the promotion ends.

Maximize Premium Features During Free Access Periods

Whether you’re using a trial, institutional access, or promotional code, the first two weeks should focus on specific outcomes rather than general browsing. InMail works best when targeted at 5-10 specific people—hiring managers, recruiters, or industry leaders with clear reasons to respond to your message.

Use LinkedIn Learning to complete one full course relevant to your current job search or role transition. Courses average 2-4 hours and provide certificates you can add to your profile. Target courses in high-demand skills like project management, data analysis, or technical writing rather than broad professional development topics.

Check the “Who’s Viewed Your Profile” section weekly. If certain companies or roles appear repeatedly in your viewer list, this signals where recruiters are actively searching for candidates like you. Adjust your profile keywords and headline to align with these patterns.

Document which Premium features you actually use during your access period. If you’ve sent zero InMails after two weeks, Premium probably won’t deliver value once the paid period begins. If you’re completing courses and consistently getting profile views from target companies, the $39.99 monthly cost may justify renewal.

If you’re building your first content strategy or want to share your experience accessing LinkedIn Premium, LinkedIn Daily welcomes submissions through our write-for-us page. Perspectives from professionals who’ve tested Premium features provide concrete value to career-focused readers.

Cancel your subscription at least five days before your trial or promotional period ends. Waiting until the final day increases the risk of charges posting before your cancellation processes. Check your credit card statement 3-5 business days after cancellation confirmation to verify no charge was applied.
September 9, 2024
Is Linkedin Worth It in 2024?

LinkedIn has 850 million users in 2024, making it worth your professional attention

LinkedIn’s value depends entirely on your career stage and goals. The platform hosts 850 million professionals worldwide, creating real networking density across industries. Free accounts let you build a profile and make connections. Premium tiers ($39.99 to $239.99 monthly) unlock tools like InMail messaging to cold-contact recruiter, advanced search filters, and profile view analytics. The question isn’t whether LinkedIn is “worth it”—it’s whether the specific features you need justify the cost for your situation.

Where most professionals actually find job leads

LinkedIn’s job board displays over 35 million active job postings as of 2024. However, direct messaging and organic network expansion produce faster results than applying through the platform’s application system. A 2023 Pew Research survey found that 45% of employed professionals discovered their current role through a personal referral, not a formal job listing. LinkedIn’s value lies in building the network that generates those referrals before you need them.

The mechanics work like this: recruiters actively browse LinkedIn profiles and search for candidates matching specific skills. Your profile acts as a living resume that appears in these searches. Maintaining an updated headline, skills section, and experience description increases the likelihood a recruiter finds you. Premium subscribers see an “Open to Work” feature that signals availability to recruiters without alerting your current employer.

Most career transitions happen through weak ties—people you know but don’t see regularly. LinkedIn makes maintaining these connections frictionless. Former colleagues, classmates, and conference attendees stay visible in your network, and you can reach out months or years later when a relevant opportunity exists.

Quantifying the networking value beyond job applications

LinkedIn’s actual return depends on activity level. Posts from users with 50,000+ followers average 890 comments and 12,400 reactions, while posts from accounts under 1,000 followers average 8 comments and 27 reactions. This disparity matters because visibility builds authority, which attracts professional opportunities beyond job boards.

Content engagement on LinkedIn functions differently than other platforms. Users spend 2.5 minutes per session on LinkedIn compared to 30+ minutes on Instagram. That time skews toward professional content consumption. An article about your industry experience posted on LinkedIn reaches people actively thinking about career decisions, whereas the same content on other platforms reaches people scrolling passively.

The platform’s native publishing feature (not posting links to external sites) gets 5x more engagement than external links. Writing directly on LinkedIn about your field expertise signals thought leadership to your network and generates inbound connections from people researching your industry.

Free versus paid tiers and realistic ROI expectations

The free LinkedIn account covers most networking needs for employed professionals who aren’t actively job hunting. You get 15 OutMail messages monthly (templated messages to people outside your network), a standard search function, and visibility in recruiter searches. This is sufficient for staying connected and discoverable.

Premium tiers make sense if you’re job searching, actively recruiting for a company, or building a personal brand through content. LinkedIn Premium (Career) costs $39.99 monthly and includes 70 InMail credits monthly (messages delivered directly to inboxes), advanced search filters to find specific roles or companies, and profile view analytics. LinkedIn Premium Business ($99.99 monthly) targets recruiters and salespeople.

Calculate ROI simply: if one job opportunity worth pursuing emerges monthly from premium features, the cost ($480 annually for Career tier) pays for itself through reduced application stress and faster hiring cycles. If you change jobs every 5 years, premium costs $2,400 total—roughly the value of a single salary negotiation difference or one role discovered faster.

Specific actions that produce measurable results on LinkedIn

Posting once weekly outperforms posting randomly. Accounts that post consistently (3-5 times monthly minimum) see a 23% higher rate of profile views from recruiters. Choose a consistent day and time. Tuesday through Thursday mornings (9 AM to 12 PM) in your timezone see the highest engagement rates.

Commenting on others’ posts generates more visibility than posting original content, especially early in your LinkedIn presence. The first three commenters on a post receive the most visibility. Spend 10 minutes daily commenting thoughtfully on posts from people in your target industry. This signals expertise to your network and the poster’s network simultaneously.

Customize connection requests with a personal message. Generic “I’d like to add you to my professional network” messages get 20% response rates. Personalized messages mentioning a specific commonality (shared industry, company, experience) achieve 67% acceptance rates.

Update your profile quarterly. Outdated roles, skills, or descriptions signal you’re not actively engaged. Adding new accomplishments, certifications, or skills takes 15 minutes and refreshes your visibility in recruiter searches.

If you’re considering writing about your experience for publication, LinkedIn Daily accepts contributions from professionals at all levels. Visit the LinkedIn Daily write-for-us page to learn submission guidelines and reach our 2+ million monthly readers.

Your immediate next step

Spend one hour this week on LinkedIn. First, audit your profile against job descriptions for roles you’d want in two years—ensure your headline and skills section use the same language recruiters search for. Second, identify three people in your target industry and send personalized connection requests. Third, set a calendar reminder to post content once weekly for the next month. These actions cost nothing beyond time and reveal whether the platform creates real opportunities for your career. After one month, you’ll have concrete data about LinkedIn’s value specifically for you.

September 9, 2024
Is Linkedin Premium Worth It for Small Business?

LinkedIn Premium costs $30 monthly for small business owners—here’s whether the ROI justifies it

LinkedIn Premium’s value hinges on one metric: whether the leads and partnerships you gain exceed $30 per month in business value. For some small business owners, that threshold is cleared within a single qualified conversation. For others, the service sits unused for months. The difference isn’t luck—it’s understanding exactly which Premium features solve your specific business problem and deploying them with precision.

What Premium Access Actually Gives You

LinkedIn Premium unlocks three primary capabilities that free accounts cannot access. First, you gain the ability to send InMail messages directly to any professional on the platform without requiring a prior connection. A standard InMail costs LinkedIn credits (bundled with Premium), allowing you to initiate contact with decision-makers whose profiles match your target client profile. Second, Premium reveals exactly who has viewed your profile—including their job title, company, and department—rather than showing generic profile view counts. Third, you access advanced search filters that let you segment LinkedIn’s 900+ million users by company size, industry, seniority level, and specific skill sets.

Sally’s Design Co., a three-person graphic design studio, used the InMail feature to contact creative directors at mid-market tech companies. Over four months, she sent 40 InMails targeting companies with 50-500 employees in the software sector. Eight of those conversations converted to project inquiries, with three becoming ongoing contracts worth $8,000 each. Without Premium’s direct messaging capability, she would have had no pathway to contact these prospects—their networks didn’t overlap with hers.

The profile-view feature delivers a secondary benefit: market research. When you see that 12 people from the same company visited your profile in a two-week span, that’s a signal that your content resonates with that organization. You can then research those individuals by name and reach out with context about their interest.

Comparing $30 Monthly Against Other Lead-Generation Costs

To evaluate Premium’s cost, benchmark it against alternatives. Google Ads for B2B services average $15-$75 per click with typical conversion rates between 2-5%, meaning you’re spending $300-$3,750 per actual lead. LinkedIn’s sponsored content (ads) follows similar economics. Regional networking events typically cost $50-$200 per attendance with no guarantee of qualified contacts. Cold email services and lead databases charge $50-$500 monthly for contact lists.

Premium’s advantage is lower friction. You’re contacting people within a professional context where they’ve already indicated openness to business conversation. TechFix, an IT solutions startup, tested both Google Ads and LinkedIn Premium in parallel. Over three months, Google Ads generated 47 clicks for $890 (about $19 per click) with two qualified leads. LinkedIn Premium’s InMail generated 18 conversations from 60 messages sent, with four qualified leads. The InMail approach produced leads at $7.50 each while simultaneously positioning the founder as an industry participant through article publishing on the platform.

This doesn’t mean Premium beats every alternative universally. If you sell B2C products or rely heavily on brand awareness rather than direct relationships, Premium’s targeting may not match your sales model. But for service providers, consultants, and B2B companies selling to professionals, the cost-per-qualified-lead often favors Premium over traditional advertising.

When Premium Delivers Measurable Returns

Premium generates clear ROI when you have these three conditions: First, your ideal customer is actively present on LinkedIn. Executives, HR directors, marketing managers, and IT decision-makers use the platform regularly. Electricians, plumbers, and local service providers rarely do. Second, your sales cycle involves relationship-building. If you sell products with 2-3 day sales cycles, Premium’s networking approach doesn’t compress your timeline. If your typical deal takes 60-90 days with multiple stakeholder conversations, Premium’s direct-access capability saves significant time. Third, you have capacity to respond to leads. Premium generates conversations—but only if you answer InMail messages within 24-48 hours. If you’re understaffed or unable to manage additional pipeline, Premium’s lead generation becomes a liability rather than an asset.

One consulting firm tested Premium for three months with zero follow-up capacity. They received 12 InMails from prospects but responded to none. They then reassigned workflow, implemented templates for initial responses, and reactivated Premium. In the next three months, 31 InMails converted to discovery calls at a 39% rate. The variable wasn’t Premium—it was operational readiness.

The Profile-View Data Advantage

Many small business owners overlook the profile-view tracking feature, but it often delivers higher ROI than InMail. When you publish content on LinkedIn and see that 50 professionals from your target companies visited your profile in response, you have a list of warm prospects. Unlike InMail, where you initiate contact cold, these people have self-identified their interest in your expertise. You can then connect with them with a message acknowledging their interest in your post, which has a dramatically higher acceptance rate than random connection requests.

The advanced search capability compounds this advantage. After publishing an article on supply chain optimization, you can search LinkedIn for all Chief Operating Officers at manufacturing companies with 100-500 employees in your geographic region who viewed your profile. You now have a segmented list of decision-makers pre-filtered by demonstrated interest. A manual outreach campaign to this group typically converts at 15-25%, compared to 2-5% for untargeted cold outreach.

Calculate Your Specific Breakeven Point

To determine if Premium suits your business, calculate your personal breakeven number. If your average customer lifetime value is $5,000, and you typically close 20% of qualified conversations into customers, then each qualified conversation is worth $1,000 in expected value. At that ratio, even a single Premium-sourced qualified conversation per month covers the full subscription cost. If your typical deal is $500, you’d need two qualified conversations monthly to justify the expense.

Map this against your historical conversion data. Most small business owners can estimate how many conversations they need to reach their monthly revenue target. Then, test Premium for two months with intentional use (three InMails per week, weekly article publishing, active response to profile viewers). Track every conversation back to Premium and measure how many converted to deals.

If you’re building thought leadership in your industry or managing a sales pipeline with long cycles and relationship-based decisions, Premium typically pays for itself. If you’re testing a new market, Premium’s targeting accuracy makes hypothesis testing more efficient than paid ads.

If you’re interested in sharing your own LinkedIn strategy insights with thousands of B2B professionals, consider submitting to LinkedIn Daily’s write-for-us page. We’re actively building our contributor network around practical, data-backed perspectives on professional development and platform strategy.

Start with two months of Premium and install basic tracking: note every meaningful conversation that originated from Premium, track those conversations to revenue, then calculate your personal cost-per-qualified-lead. This removes opinion from the equation and shows you precisely whether Premium is working for your business model.

September 8, 2024
Does Linkedin Premium Show Salary?
LinkedIn Premium grants access to salary data across 80+ countries and 500+ job titles

LinkedIn Premium subscribers can view detailed salary ranges for specific roles, locations, and experience levels. The Salary Insights feature displays compensation data collected from LinkedIn member profiles, tax records, and third-party sources. This access directly addresses one of the most common negotiation scenarios: entering a conversation without knowing what comparable employees earn.

For someone considering a role at a competitor or evaluating an internal promotion offer, these numbers matter. The salary tool shows not just averages, but percentile distributions—what the bottom 25%, median, and top 25% of earners in a given role actually make. That specificity changes how you approach compensation discussions.

What Premium members see that Basic members don’t

LinkedIn Basic (free) allows profile browsing, job applications, and limited profile views. LinkedIn Premium ($39.99/month or $239.88/year) adds five concrete capabilities:
- Full salary ranges by job title, company size, and location—Basic members see none of this data
- Profile viewer analytics showing exactly who viewed your profile and when (Basic shows only generic categories like “recruiter” or “sales”)
- InMail messaging to contact anyone on LinkedIn without requiring a prior connection
- Recruiter filter to identify active hiring managers in your target companies
- Search results ranked by relevance or how recently someone viewed your profile
The salary feature specifically requires Premium. Basic users cannot access the Salary Insights page at all. This isn’t a limited preview—it’s completely hidden from free accounts.

How to access and use the salary tool

Premium subscribers navigate to linkedin.com/salary and enter three variables: job title, company (optional), and location. The tool then returns a salary range with these data points:
- Base salary range with 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile breakdowns
- Total compensation estimates including bonuses and stock options where available
- Salary trends showing whether compensation in that role increased or decreased year-over-year
- Experience-level breakdowns (entry-level versus senior roles show different ranges)
- Company-specific salary data when available (showing what Google pays versus Amazon for the same title)
LinkedIn aggregates this data from members who voluntarily add salary information to their profiles, employer-reported data, and survey responses. The platform doesn’t disclose exact company names or individual salaries—only aggregated ranges. This approach protects privacy while providing actionable benchmarks.

For example, a Product Manager search in San Francisco returns a range of $155K–$245K base salary with total compensation between $180K–$290K. Those numbers shift immediately if you filter for “5+ years experience” versus “entry-level.” The tool lets you make that comparison in seconds.

Practical applications for salary negotiation

The most direct use case: you receive a job offer at $165K for a Senior Product Manager role in Austin. Before responding, you pull the LinkedIn Salary data for that title in Austin. You discover the 75th percentile is $185K. That 13% difference ($20K annually) becomes your opening position in negotiation conversations with the hiring manager.

Alternatively, you’re in a review cycle with your current employer and want to request a raise. LinkedIn Salary data lets you present externally-verified compensation benchmarks. You can tell your manager: “According to LinkedIn data from 4,000+ Senior Marketing Managers in Chicago with my experience level, the median salary is $145K. I’m currently at $128K.” That framing shifts the conversation from “I want more” to “market data suggests an adjustment.”

The tool also surfaces industry salary trends. If you work in cybersecurity, you might notice that compensation for Security Engineers increased 8% year-over-year in your region. That trend data supports your case for a larger raise than your company’s standard 3% increase.

When Premium salary insights aren’t enough

LinkedIn’s salary data reflects what members self-report. In industries where compensation is highly variable (consulting, tech startups with equity packages, sales roles with commissions), the ranges can be broad. A 75th percentile of $290K total compensation might include someone earning $150K base plus $140K in stock options versus someone earning $220K base with $70K bonus—very different financial structures.

Additionally, LinkedIn’s data skews toward users in major tech hubs. Salary information for niche roles in smaller markets may be sparse. And the tool doesn’t account for non-salary compensation like healthcare quality, remote work flexibility, or education benefits—factors that shift your effective compensation equation.

For these reasons, smart negotiators use LinkedIn Salary Insights as one input alongside Glassdoor reviews, Bureau of Labor Statistics data, and conversations with recruiters in your field. LinkedIn’s strength is immediacy and specificity by location and job title—not completeness.

Next step: Download your salary data before negotiating

Before your next salary conversation—whether a new job offer or internal review—spend 10 minutes in the LinkedIn Salary tool. Search your exact job title, your location, and filter by your experience level. Screenshot the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile numbers. That document becomes your reference point for any negotiation.

If LinkedIn’s salary feature interests you and you have additional insights on how professionals use compensation data, consider contributing to LinkedIn Daily. We’re actively seeking writers who cover professional development, compensation strategy, and career advancement. View our write-for-us opportunities here to pitch your expertise.
September 8, 2024